There is a Hulk in each one of us. And whenever we are pushed in adversity, however meek we may be in our daily existence, the Hulk within us emerges to destroy everything that is trying to destroy us. And we all have it within us. Only thing is that like Dr. Bruce Banner, we never really want to expose this Hulk to the outer world – because if we do, the consequences could be disastrous for all, except ourselves.
This is picking up once again from where I left off with X-Men, the Last Stand, where I was speaking about comic book ideology and polemic. Comic books really are not what they are generically made to believe. They have an ideology, with by itself is a stark contrast to what we conceive them as. They are double intending literature, both to arouse fantasy and leave back a story. A story about the characters is my area of concern. The rest is just to express the means to that concern.
Each and every superhero has a story behind him. And this story is about ourselves, much magnified for the purpose of entertainment. But my very basic question in this matter, containing myself to the character that I am talking about now, the Hulk, is why is Dr. Bruce Banner always scared to unleash the Hulk, even when he is under attack from various quarters. That I believe is the moral victory of good over evil. We all have psychic imbalances – no one is free from that. But the question, as always is, which way are we more prone, or bent. That is what makes the difference between the superhero and the supervillain, or on realistic terms, between us and them. Some of the most iconic villains in this universe are after all beautiful minds, if I may put it so. Be it Osama Bin Laden, or closer home, our very own Charles Shobraj. But the fact is that they are bent over to the darker aspects of psychology and therefore, they turn to acts of terror. Had they been channelized in the other direction, I doubt it if we would ever have a problem with anything in the world.
But the show must go on. For every dark character in this world, there is a good. And good normally wins over evil, because the world has to go on. An anarchist can end our existence, but we can’t let that happen. We have been fighting for our survival since the days of the Amoeba. And now that we are animals with intellect, we have to survive at an even greater cost. It kinds of massages our ego. Thereby the social imbalance, tilting in the favour of the ‘good’. So we see perhaps, that even though Dr Banner wants to put the Hulk to rest once and for all, when the Abomination turns up, he cannot help but get back into the flesh of the Hulk to go and save mankind. That is why the Hulk is a superhero and not the other way round. And the good always comes out in the face of adversity. It happened here, and it always happens under every circumstance. Whenever the world is on the verge of destruction, heroes come up – now they may be shown as Captain America, Daredevil, Wolverine or even Spiderman, we just have to take the cue from them.
And this is the demarcation that people are expected to make. To understand the good guys from the bad. If the bad can come in any package and we are ok about it, then the same professional courtesy needs to be offered to the good as well. We may all look like anything the other person can imagine, but the fact of the matter that differentiates us from the other, is what lies in our heart. If people around us cannot understand that, then truly it is very sad.
There is another legend too that I will need to speak about when speaking of the Hulk. It is the much fabled, Prometheus story that we have heard from our very births. The Hulk, I feel, is indeed a modern day Prometheus. Dr Bruce Banner tried to alter the fundamentals of nature, to control it, but he turned into the Hulk. Now the good or bad Hulk is something that we just spoke of, but the fact again comes to the fore about temperament. Yes, there is a match obtained here with a legendary lore, but should that really be a factor of denial? Should we say that the Banner deserved what he got because he tried to experiment? Do we treat him the same way as the Gods treated Prometheus? Or do we want to make him a hero for trying to do something? We are actually rather content with the way things are. We always talk about changing the world, but we won’t even bother planting a single plant in our own backyard to combat global warming. We just want the whole thing done for us and we’ll just come in there to sweep the glory. That never happens. Therefore, we need a Dr Bruce Banner, who has it in him to find out ways to change things, to develop something for the betterment of all humanity and then, and then if he fails, he channelizes his new found powers again for the betterment of humanity. That’s the way it’s done.
The Incredible Hulk I’d say was a much better movie than the first one. For starters, it has one of the greatest actors in cinematic history playing the much demanding role of Dr. Bruce Banner – Edward Norton. I know that most people have not even heard of his name (at the most, if we see him, we say, “Oh! The Fight Club guy”) but he is truly at league with the best of the world. He understands the whole medium and that is what makes him such a great actor. Don’t get me wrong. Eric Bana was also pretty good and he did try his level best to save that film. But it never really got to it. I did miss Jennifer Connelly in the second movie, but Liz Tyler was alright, nothing to write home about.
And unlike the last movie, here we actually see the Hulk trying to defend the world. The last one was a personal feud between General Ross and Banner. This one feature the Abomination in the sexy climax. It brought in all the ingredients from the comic book – which is very important when trying to make a superhero movie. It should be something that all readers can relate to.
Overall, give it a shot. It’s a cool film, even if you don’t see it the way I did.

Defiance: n. Open disobedience; bold resistance

How true. This definition could perhaps best sum the whole effort. The whole effort which makes miracles seem fragile. The whole effort which allows one to believe that to be human is to be everything; the whole effort that allows one to understand the complexity of actions, the menace of situations and also offers the hazardous solutions.

This happens to me quite a lot. It happened after I saw Schindler’s List and it has happened now once again, after watching Defiance. It leaves me really with no words for the movie. Because in these cases, the movie itself becomes obsolete and redundant. It is the story itself which speaks. And this one more that the other that I just mentioned. Because this was an example of raw courage, of absolute heroism, that, if romanticized, makes the whole effort futile. But purists will scoff at what I said. How could I?

But how could they? How could they keep recruiting Jews to defend them, when they had nothing to offer. Just a few days more maybe, as the way they put it. And in those few days, they lived and surged along, allowing people to make new definitions of miracles, and more importantly of the word freedom. Three poor brothers, smuggling themselves into ghettos, only to smuggle out some more Jews? What more can you say about them. That they were the real Moses? That they were the stories that build myths? That they were the stories that offer an absolutism to theology?

And this is where the profane blunder always happens. By making them messengers of God, we ruin their whole effort. We do not do justice to their deeds. We bring in the hand of a mere abstraction, just to wipe away what is the real in front of our eyes. If we were to just believe that these people were human, we increase our own standards to newer levels. We allow ourselves to believe that really, nothing is impossible. But that is to arduous a task to take up. That is too much work for ourselves, we who are born with silver spoons in our mouths and we who have never faced a crisis in our sheltered life. We believe taking a bus is a struggle, we believe walking in the sun is a struggle, we believe not drinking coffees at Baristas is a struggle. We really do lead charmed lives and never once do we realise that when the moment ever comes, we will be found wanting. Because from there to here, we have learnt nothing, but perhaps to dust matters under the carpet. We as a social, humanitarian being have dissolved away into obscurity. We are critical today of the breath we take, not realising for once maybe that it is because of heroes like these that we breathe any air today. That 1200 people saved through these incredible chapters of human history now allow ten million people to inhabit the world today.

The day when we again know how to get off our cushions and the day when we can know what being brothers to each other is like, maybe that day, we will then learn that our revenge is the fact that we live. That is our defiance.

Freedom: n. 1 condition of being free or unrestricted. 2 personal or civic liberty. 3 liberty of action (freedom to leave). 4 (foll. by from) exemption from. 5 (foll. by of) a honorary membership or citizenship (freedom of the city). b unrestricted use of (a house etc.).

His name is Robert Paulson! He is the middle child of history, no place or purpose... he has no great war to fight, he has no great depression. His only war is a spiritual one, his only depression is his life.

Is it just him, or is it us all?

What a thought... that only in death do we have a name! A name that will be etched on to our tombstones! That is all that we amount to at the end of the day. That is the only mark that we leave behind. And that is the only way that we are ever known by other people. Not unless we do something big. Not unless, perhaps, if we let ourselves flow along with what we really want to be.

Positivity and negativity are really two sides of a coin. As far as I can understand, it will be absolutely a cardinal sin if we look upon these terms as absolute. It is just the way we want to make the whole story out ourselves is what really adds that dimension to the whole picture.

I know that most people would love to call this a negative nightmare. One that Edward Norton claims to have had. But like I say, it should perhaps more be looked upon as a negative dream. The word dream is always ascribed to something that is considered to be negative, isn’t it? And when we get up all sweaty and scared, we claim it to be a nightmare – a negative imbalance. However, as I was just saying a few minutes back, if the terms are null and void, then the prefix doesn’t amount to shit.

That was my opinion when I finished with Fight Club. Make no mistake about it, not just me, everyone loved it. Because this may be the only movie that we have all seen in a while, which allows us to negotiate answers from the questions we prop. It allows us to gather a vent to the most problematic delusion that we all face in the world today.

We so badly want to be someone today that we never really realise what we are right now. The present is sold for the future, leaving us just with the gory past at the end of it. We do not know what we are doing, we cannot sleep; we live like a consumer product because we are all so full of them that we have become them.

Not unless we all display the potential courage required to unleash the Tyler Durden in us. He’s the man that we all have inside us, the one that we all confide in and the one that we all want to become. Only that we do not have the guts to be anti-establishment. We are all, somewhere or the other, escapists. We all want to have the hottest people around us, we want to fuck the sizzlers, but seldom do we realise that we are nowhere close to getting that – because we are no one in ourselves.

We are all so bothered about living the ‘right’ life that we forget the third party intrusions in our life. And we are so normal with that, that we do not even realise that we are no longer ourselves. We all want the best in life, without being bothered about the fact that we really don’t deserve it. We all think that we are so god dammed talented that we can do anything that we want – only that in the process, we end up being able to do nothing. And yet that does not dampen our spirits, because when people ask us whether they’re talented or not, we generally offer condolence lines, because who want to be known as a party pooper, even if the response in a few light years away from the truth.

Fact be told, we all are living a life of utter confusion, but such normalised confusion that we are not aware that there exists any confusion within us.

But not anymore! Now we all know about Tyler Durden. And if we want, we can invoke him to come to our rescue. For that we need no one else, just to be ourselves at the end of it all. But that is really the most difficult part. Because then we have to tread a rather difficult path. And if we knew how to do it, then we all wouldn’t be in this mess, would we now? Oh yes, there will be ten people who after watching this movie, will start hallucinating that they are Tyler Durden. But he was just a prototype. To become what he is, we have to all try and be a little different. That is, we all have to be ourselves. Never mind if that overlaps with someone else, but as long as it is YOU, till then it’s all fine.

Now if you look at it positively, you will be able to see Tyler in yourself and make the final push towards the envelope – else just look at it as a morose affair and get rid of the whole feeling.

Whether you want your name to be remembered because of what you did when alive, or whether you want to become a tombstone at the cemetery, is something that you will have to decide for yourself. The choice is yours...

(PS. If you ask me though, I would perhaps have preferred to see Mathew Perry in the shoes of Edward Norton. Not that I think that the latter was bad or anything in the movie, there is just something that tells me that Perry would have been able to balance the dopey look and the button pusher role a little more charismatically. That is the only observation that I have from the movie that could perhaps have been given a second look. Otherwise, it was off the hook!)

I should suppose that all the awards – make that popular awards – made out only for Hindi films under the name of Indian films are over, let’s get down to my unpopular awards. Yes, I know, only three people are going to read this, so let’s get over with it fast.
And oh, before I get to the nominations and the awards and all that jazz, let me first congratulate Filmfare for changing their methods this time – they have indeed given some rather good rewarding awards this time, and that truly is a great change.
Now, let’s get on with the show...

Best Film
Rock On...
Oye Lucky! Lucky Oye!
A Wednesday
Aamir
Jodhaa Akbar

Best Director
Abhishek Kapoor (Rock On...)
Dibakar Banerjee (Oye Lucky! Lucky Oye!)
Neeraj Pandey (A Wednesday)
Rajkumar Gupta (Aamir)
Ashutosh Gowariker (Jodhaa Akbar)

Best Actor (Male)
Farhan Akhtar (Rock On...)
Abhay Deol (Oye Lucky! Lucky Oye!)
Nasseruddin Shah (A Wednesday)
Rajeev Khandelwal (Aamir)
Hrithik Roshan (Jodha Akbar)

Best Actor (Female)
No Nominations

Best Supporting Actor (Male)
Arjun Rampal (Rock On...)
Purav Kohli (Rock On...)
Anupam Kher (A Wednesday)
Prateek Babbar (Jaane Tu.. Ya Jaane Na)

Best Supporting Actor (Female)
Sahana Goswami (Rock On...)

Best Music
Shankar-Ehsaan-Loy (Rock On...)
Amit Trivedi (Aamir)
A R Rahman (Jodhaa Akbar)

(I am sorry I don’t remember the names of most of the people nominated in the technical departments – most of them being debutants. I shall list these last few awards under the names of the movies – Subhojit)

Best Cinematography
Aamir
Jodhaa Akbar
Rock on...
The Last Lear

Best Editing
Aamir
Jodhaa Akbar
Oye Lucky! Lucky Oye!
Rock On...
Jodhaa Akbar

Best Story
A Wednesday
Oye Lucky! Lucky Oye!
The Last Lear
Rock On...
Aamir

Ma Kasam, Maza Aa Gaya!!!

After my friend and I finished watching this one there was only one phase that came to our lips almost immediately and at the same time – Ma Kasam!

I was reading and hearing everywhere that Hollywood is suddenly showing a more rapid interest in India – primarily because the recession has made the working environment a mud pit and therefore they are nowadays looking more towards this country than ever before. For starters, it was believed at one point that the great Steven Spielberg too had tied up with Anil Ambani for his production house, DreamWorks.

But now, let us get off the drab the financials. Financials, recession, marketing, sales, etc – these all somehow add up to justify all the moves that I was talking of till now. However, my inquisition here is different. As a matter of fact, it is indeed rather different. Because here I am talking about the style of writing the scenarios, the whole basic screenplay. This movie relies completely on beaten to death Bollywood clichés and terminology, not from now, but from the 70s. The only thing that they did not make Wolverine say in the movie was perhaps “Mere paas maa hain!”

It was fun to watch an English movie like that for the first time. No, I don’t mean to say that the Americans have never made a typical Bollywood pot-boiler before, but this time they surely did take the cake. Instead of having Shah Rukh Khan ham over his dialogues, this time we got to see Hugh Jackman tell them. Well, how he told them will be examined in detail later on.

No, why later on? It should be done right now. Because if this movie really has anything in it, it is really the principal actor, the hero of the film – Hugh Jackman. I know that this is not the first time that he is playing this particular character. He is the Wolverine. But however, I feel that there is a difference between playing the Wolverine in the earlier X-Men parts and now. Because at that time, though he did manage to hog most of the limelight himself, there was a certain egalitarian distribution of the screen between all the other major X-Men characters, like Storm, Cyclops, the Phoenix and so on. But here he was the movie. His name was on the movie poster. He was the name of the movie. And only he could pull it off the way in which he did it. I do remember telling Hitesh that it takes a Hugh Jackman to pull off a Wolverine get up – the crazy beard and the horn-like hair-do. And the fact of the matter is that he does is marvellously. He really pulls off a rather half-baked script with complete control and precision. He is truly the most popular X-Men ever – both as a character, and as an actor.

Also, I should mention that the SFX used in this film were a shade higher than that used in the earlier versions. It gave Jackman some company at the lonely end of the film. As mentioned, he was the forerunner in this movie, with the SFX allowing him to carry it one step further.

I have in my last article spoken of in detail about the various sociological developments in comic book characters and the part that I wrote about the Wolverine becomes all the more logical when we see this movie. It has allowed me to ratify the points that I had spoken of. Therefore, if you have read on through whatever I droned on earlier, this will suitably provide you with the audio-visual supplement and allow you to grapple the fact in a more convenient manner. Particularly the whole Vietnam thing.

This is just a simple feel-good movie, so watch it if you really have nothing else to do – and if you can, watch it for Hugh Jackman.

Just remember, “... there is no redemption where I’m going!”

Just don’t look for any...

Superhero movies – the actual real ones, the ones that had a lot of thought going into them – always serve a double purpose when they are made into movies; and good movies at that! See, when we were young and were introduced to say Batman, we saw him as a cool guy with the utility belt, a smooth car, and oodles of intelligence and mesmerising muscles. Obviously, we never decided to venture into the areas of the vigilante, the social circumstances and the very basic need for a selfless hero. But as adults our horizon increased. We slowly started to realise the importance of Vietnam in the creation of the superhero – the anti-establishment, anti-authority individual, who does not waste his time in speeches, but rather uses his fists to get things done; because the anti-Vietnam individual knows that speeches really get you nowhere, that the word democracy is a farce, used by people who form the superstructure to form your ideology for you and make you believe you are responsible for it. It’s the same thing when politicians here in India ask you to vote. They say that your one vote can make or break a good government. But when they themselves don’t know who they are going to align with after the election results are out, how can the government really be your own? And how did your vote really help?

Anyway, that was just to prove a point, but I think I digressed a little too much. Back to the situation at hand, I was talking about the superhero genre of films and as I have already explained the sociological reasons for the formation of the superhero in the minds of the creator (in most cases our very own beloved Stan Lee), I hope now it can be understood how the Wolverine developed the way he did. And the most surprising thing – the Wolverine was a rather late entrant into the world of the X-Men, but within a few issues he became one of the most popular X-Men ever. Because at the end of the day, people never did like Vietnam, and here you have an individual who had all the qualities that people wanted during the Vietnam era. Who thought that a simple comic book could really be so complicated?

And now, in the new millennia, almost 30 years down the line, the Wolverine is still so popular that look who played him in the motion picture – the sexiest man alive, Hugh Jackman. And he played it with style, with panache. Clearly, the most popular X-Men character, played by the most popular actor of today – a clear indication that even today, the Wolverine has all our votes as the most popular comic book character ever.

And of course there is also Dr. Xavier, Storm, Cyclops, Jean/Phoenix, the Beast – and a host of new entrants like Kitty, Iceman (Bobby) and Colossus (Peter). And this time the problem is greater than ever. A new antidote has been invented, one from a mutant itself, whose special powers allow other mutants to become human again through him. And the government allows mutants to voluntarily take this shot if they want to convert themselves into humans. But Magneto believes that the word ‘voluntary’ is just a play of words – the real intent behind the ‘cure’ is to exterminate the mutant race and therefore he decides to act, creating his ‘brotherhood of mutants’. And to that we now have a class V mutant on the loose – yes, our very own Jean Grey, who now bears the persona of the Phoenix, the evil side to her who had been embedded in her subconscious by Dr. Xavier. Not only does she kill Scott (Cyclops), but also the Professor, leaving the X-Men short-handed. They are now joined once again by Dr. Henry McCoy, Secretary of Mutant Affairs of the US Government, the Beast. And of course the young Turks that Storm has been training – Iceman, Kitty and Colossus. So the six of them now have to decide whose side they are on – the humans or mutants, or between good versus evil.

The movie does not have to be told more beyond this point. It can be seen. It should be seen, because another aspect of the superhero genre is also how to work as a team to get the desired results. The criminals do it as well – be it the Riddler and Two-Face in the legendary Batman Forever, or now in this movie.

Speaking of criminals, the question of where to fit in Magneto is also a rather debatable thought. Yes, he wants a war and he intends to fight it, but is Magneto really a villain – Because he had seen the eradication of Jews at Nazi camps as a child. He lost his parents that way and it is, I feel, perfectly natural for him to suppose that the same will also happen to mutants all over the world. And in this world, it is always ‘better you than me’. Understanding the superhero genre is never easy. Not unless all you are interested in is to see some god SFX and get on with it. But the real fun is in peeling the layers. I have always found comic books to be extremely educative – be it X-Men, Batman or even Tintin.

So grab a DVD, watch the movie, and if you already have watched it earlier, see it again and try to understand it once again. It should allow you to open newer avenues and yet allow you to have fun at the same time.

Superhero genres – good for children and adults. You just need the vision to see it.

Its X-Men, the Last Stand. Whose side will you be on?

Love and punishment – Dostoevsky’s Saawariya

I have never really enjoyed Sanjay Leela Bhansali’s films. He is a rather egoistic director, who blows his canvas way out of proportion. He has the right intent every time he makes a movie, his heart is in the right place, but his brain is all screwed. Be is Khamoshi, where he beautifully segments the story of a girl who sings when her parents are deaf, be it the story of a love between the person who teaches a girl how to love and her husband who teaches her how to hold love in Hum Dil De Chuke Sanam, or the story of a deaf, dumb and blind girl who makes it in this world on her own in Black, each of these movies he has messed up with his over the top direction. I always felt that SLB would make a very good writer, and a very good maker of fantasy tales – not that he can make a Pan’s Labyrinth because he does not have that vision, but he weaves tales around love and hope and that too appeals quite a lot in this dark world.

So I watched Saawariya, because I had nothing better to do and it’s alright just to give him a look. It wouldn’t hurt me. And even this time, the story was right on the block hole, credit to that should first go to Fyodor Dostoevsky and since this is a semi-fantastical setup, he managed to hold my attention in bits and pieces. Yes, he does drag as always, but if you can keep skipping forward, you can make something out of it. At least you can see it once.

But the point in this movie that really appealed to me was the storyline. Dostoevsky’s White Nights is credited right at the beginning and this is a wonderful story. It is a little larger than life and the problem with these tales are that they are too filled with the milk of human kindness – we do not see such characters around us. But I like it. We don’t see these characters may be, but it feels good to know that there could be people like this. Like Federico Fellini had once said, “Only the idealist is the true visionary of the world,” similarly it is such idealism that gives us a faint hope of a better tomorrow. Not that it will happen, because there are too many selfish loafers in this world, currency has gained the first place as a class divider and corruption manager, and because people just care for themselves – they couldn’t give a damn to spread a smile (unless they get full credit for it and make it to Page 3, or any small 2x2 column somewhere).

And when the boy and girl fall in love for a couple of minutes, only to find that her lover has finally arrived, she asks him whether she can go... and he sends her off, with a smile. It was beautiful. His love and his punishment – he spent all his life making others happy, today he was left to do that once again. It’s a painful story no doubt, but those three minutes make up for it. You can be one with the guy – and you can feel his pain, his joy and his suffering. Really, a Pandora’s box.

What SLB does well though, is he gets Ranbir Kapoor and Sonam Kapoor to fill in the characters and they bring a wide array of freshness into the whole film. RK takes off from where his father left off, including his father’s “Kya tumne kisi se pyar kiya?” line. He has the looks and the talent and he’ll make it well on his own. Sonam Kapoor though on the other hand has one of the most beautiful smiles I have ever seen. Her character’s innocence and childishness have come to the fore because of her. Though Deepike Padukone’s hot air tricks may have edged her out in award ceremonies, Sonam Kapoor will go a long way in films. She has the makings to be a legendary actress – her down to earth looks, he laugh, her smile, her emotions are all in the right place.

SLB seems to have repaid Salman Khan from taking away Aishwarya Rai in Hum Dil De Chuke Sanam and he does not have much to do in the film anyway. Maybe that’s why he has done well. Rani Mukherjee, as the film’s narrator has done rather well, though she isn’t on the scene all the time. She left her mark each time she came on. But the real darling of the whole film was Zohra Sehgal. She was simply amazing and she brought the real essence on screen. Be it her clipped English, or her amazing tantrums, she is the Kohinoor in the queen’s crown.

It’s an alright movie. But this is Dostoevsky’s movie. SLB is just a facilitator. So see it only if you can skip through a lot of the movie and see it only for the writer and the actors. Some songs are good, the rest you can skip. I’d give it 2.5 stars, the remaining 2.5 being murdered by SLB alone.